Case 3201759/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Davies v Michael Campbell — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201759/2019
- Decision date
- 13 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Davies
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked for the respondent as a pub manager from 27 May to 17 June 2019. The tribunal accepted her oral evidence in full. It found that she was paid one week in arrears and, when she resigned after working Monday to Thursday in her final week, she was owed wages for one week in hand plus those four days. The tribunal also found that accrued holiday pay had not been paid and that she had fully co-operated with the respondent to ensure payment.
The complaint of unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996 was upheld, as was the complaint of unpaid holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal awarded £954 for unpaid wages and £265 for accrued holiday pay, equivalent to 2.5 days. It also recorded that the claimant had never been given a statement of terms and conditions of employment, contrary to section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996.
Because no section 1 statement had been provided and the claimant had done all she could to secure payment of her wages, the tribunal made an additional award under section 38 Employment Act 2002. That award was assessed at half of the claimant's monthly pay, being £265. The total sum awarded was £1,484, to be paid net of lawful deductions for tax and national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unpaid wages under section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996; tribunal found the claimant was owed one week in hand and four days of her final week. | Upheld | — | £954 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998; tribunal assessed this as equivalent to 2.5 days. | Upheld | — | £265 |
| Other | Additional award under section 38 Employment Act 2002 because no section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996 statement of terms and conditions had been provided; assessed at half of monthly pay. | Upheld | — | £265 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,484
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.