Case 3201763/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Reid v Vinci Construction UK Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3201763/2023
- Decision date
- 16 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Brewer Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Reid
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard a preliminary issue on whether Ms M Reid was disabled within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010 during the relevant period, agreed by the parties as 1 November 2022 to 17 September 2023. It considered GP records, Inclusion Thurrock records, two disability impact statements, and oral evidence. The tribunal found that Ms Reid had a mental impairment, namely anxiety and depression, during the relevant period, although the severity fluctuated and there were periods when she was coping better than at others.
The tribunal accepted her evidence that the impairment affected normal day-to-day activities including cooking, cleaning, motivation, concentration, sleep, and engagement with her family. It noted the respondent's point that she had almost no sickness absence, continued to work, drove to work and client meetings, and helped in the background with setting up Nu Me Salons Limited, but held that those facts did not show that her ability to carry out day-to-day activities was unaffected. The tribunal found that she was trying to cope and that outward functioning did not negate the existence of impairment.
Applying the statutory definition of disability, the tribunal found that the adverse effect was substantial, meaning more than minor or trivial, and that it was long term. It relied on the claimant's prior history of anxiety and depression from 2018, counselling in 2021 and again in 2023, the March and April 2023 GP entries, and the Inclusion Thurrock material showing ongoing symptoms. The tribunal concluded that the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010. No monetary remedy was determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal decided whether the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010 during 1 November 2022 to 17 September 2023. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010 paragraphs 2 and 5
- Aderemi v London and South Eastern Railway Limited
- Goodwin v Patent Office
- Cruickshank v VAW Motorcast Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.