Case 3201774/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S McMahon v Maria Fanchette Baya t/a Kingston House — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201774/2019
- Decision date
- 9 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S McMahon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing at the East London Hearing Centre on 9 December 2019 before Employment Judge Gardiner, the parties resolved the claim by consent. The tribunal recorded a judgment that the Respondent, Maria Fanchette Baya t/a Kingston House, was to pay Miss S McMahon a redundancy payment under section 162 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The award was calculated from gross weekly pay of £234.90 and 5.5 weeks' pay, producing a redundancy payment of £1,291.95. No other head of loss, discrimination issue, or separate remedy was recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Judgment entered by consent. The Respondent was ordered to pay a redundancy payment calculated under section 162 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £1,292 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,292
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 162 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.