Case 3201785/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Verity v Ford Motor Company Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201785/2019
- Decision date
- 28 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Ross Members
- Panel members
- Mrs M Legg, Dr L Rylah
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Verity
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 22 October 2020 before Employment Judge A Ross sitting with Mrs M Legg and Dr L Rylah, the parties agreed that a second appeal would consider whether the Claimant satisfied the medical disability retirement criteria as at that date, based on his medical history. They also agreed that there would be no further appeal or reconsideration of the same medical evidence, that the Claimant would attend any medical practitioner he wished to provide medical evidence as soon as practicable, and that he would use reasonable endeavours to produce any additional medical report within 14 days and in any event within 42 days.
The judgment then records that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. The judgment does not set out any substantive liability findings, does not record any monetary award, and notes that neither side would make any application for costs.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. It contains no merits findings and no costs application was made. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.