Case 3201790/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Phillips v Next Chapter Homes Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 3201790/2017
- Decision date
- 15 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Phillips
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 28 September 2018 before Employment Judge Tobin, the tribunal held that Mr B Phillips's claims in respect of his shortfall of wages, brought pursuant to section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996, and/or in breach of contract succeeded against Next Chapter Homes Limited. The judgment does not separate liability between the two legal bases, but records a successful monetary claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim in respect of shortfall of wages under section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeded; the judgment did not split the award between this and the contract claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal also found the claim succeeded in breach of contract. The judgment did not apportion the monetary award between the legal bases. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,113
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £5,050
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.