Case 3201792/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Foard v E-Novations (london) Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201792/2019
- Decision date
- 18 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lewis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Foard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld Mr A Foard’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records that the claim succeeded in full.
The tribunal awarded £333.33 gross wages, to be paid net of any deductions for tax and national insurance, together with £153.97 in compensation for the claimant’s financial loss sustained as a result of the respondent’s unlawful deduction of wages. The award was ordered to be paid forthwith under section 24(1)(a) and section 24(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and awarded £333.33 gross wages plus £153.97 compensation for financial loss, payable forthwith. | Upheld | — | £487 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £487
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £154
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13 ERA 1996
- s.24(1)(a) ERA 1996
- s.24(2) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.