Case 3201820/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Aaron Mathew Mcclymont v Wallis Coffee Shop Limited t/a The Yard (in Receivership) — 2024
- Case reference
- 3201820/2023
- Decision date
- 12 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Aaron Mathew Mcclymont
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 12 March 2024 at East London Hearing Centre, conducted by video, neither party attended or was represented. Employment Judge C H O'Rourke recorded that the Claimant had not attended or been represented at the hearing.
The judgment states that the Claimant's claims of unfair dismissal, arrears of holiday pay, unlawful deductions from wages, and 'other payments' are dismissed. No findings on the underlying facts of the employment relationship or the substance of the claims are set out in the short judgment.
No remedy was awarded and no separate monetary figures are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the Claimant did not attend or was not represented at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to 'arrears of holiday pay'. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to 'unlawful deductions from wages'. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment refers to 'other payments' but does not further specify the type of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.