Case 3201837/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Wilkinson v Ayletts House Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3201837/2019
- Decision date
- 18 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Byrne Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Wilkinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld Ms A Wilkinson's claims for unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal against Ayletts House Ltd. The judgment is brief on liability reasoning and moves directly to remedy, recording that both claims succeeded and that the award was made on a combined basis rather than by separate apportionment between the two claims.
For remedy, the tribunal found that Ms Wilkinson was 26 at the date of dismissal and had completed seven years' service. Using a gross weekly pay of £315, it calculated a basic award of £1,732.50. The tribunal also recorded that she found alternative employment of a similar type from 15 June 2019, so no further financial loss was claimed after that date.
The compensatory award was assessed at £5,685.48. This included £2,024.19 for seven weeks' pay between expiry of the notice period and starting the new job, £2,024.19 for failure to pay contractual notice in the wrongful dismissal claim, and £500 for loss of statutory rights. The tribunal then added an uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code, and awarded a grand total of £7,417.98 payable forthwith.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal upheld this claim and made a single combined remedy award with the wrongful dismissal claim, rather than apportioning sums between them. The remedy section includes a compensatory award calculation with an ACAS Code uplift; one line contains a 25%/15% inconsistency, but the stated uplift figure is £1,137.10. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal upheld this claim and made a single combined remedy award with the unfair dismissal claim, rather than apportioning sums between them. The remedy section includes a compensatory award calculation with an ACAS Code uplift; one line contains a 25%/15% inconsistency, but the stated uplift figure is £1,137.10. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,418
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,733
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £5,685
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.