Case 3201838/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E Barrett v Nova Marketing Systems Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201838/2020
- Decision date
- 9 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge GOODRICH
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E Barrett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Mrs E Barrett succeeded on two claims against Nova Marketing Systems Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £2,000.00.
The tribunal also found that the claimant's claim for damages for breach of contract succeeded and ordered payment of £476.00. The extracted judgment does not record any further reasoning, hearing attendance, or separate remedy breakdown beyond those two sums, and it is signed by Employment Judge Goodrich on 9 October 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; respondent ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,000.00. | Upheld | — | £2,000 |
| Breach of contract | Claimant's damages claim for breach of contract succeeded; respondent ordered to pay £476.00. | Upheld | — | £476 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,476
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.