Case 3201846/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Rojek v Den Automation Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201846/2019
- Decision date
- 16 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Rojek
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Rojek brought claims against Den Automation Limited for unauthorised deduction from wages and for accrued but unpaid holiday entitlement. The respondent did not attend the hearing and no ET3 was presented. The tribunal allowed both claims.
On the wages claim, the tribunal awarded £9,129.14. The figure was identified as 60% salary for June 2019, salary from 1 July to 15 September 2019, and the 3% employer pension contribution in June 2019. On the holiday entitlement claim, the tribunal awarded £1,413.51 for accrued but unpaid holiday pay.
The tribunal refused the application for a preparation time order. No separate discrimination, dismissal, or other heads of claim were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal described this as an 'unauthorised deduction from wages' claim and awarded £9,129.14, made up of 60% salary for June 2019, salary from 1 July to 15 September 2019, and the 3% employer pension contribution in June 2019. | Upheld | — | £9,129 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claim for accrued but unpaid holiday entitlement succeeded and awarded £1,413.51. | Upheld | — | £1,414 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,543
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.