Case 3201847/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v De Souza v The Whiter Smile Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3201847/2020
- Decision date
- 22 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mclaren Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn the case of Miss V de Souza v The Whiter Smile Limited, heard at East London Hearing Centre on 18 March 2021 before Employment Judge Mclaren, the tribunal considered a claim for unfair dismissal under s104 ERA. The extracted judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim did not succeed.
The same judgment records that the claims for unlawful deductions from wages were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. No monetary award, remedy breakdown, or other substantive remedy is recorded in the extracted text, and the judgment is dated 22 March 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claim under s104 ERA did not succeed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claims for unlawful deductions from wages were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s104 ERA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.