Case 3201850/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Harlovleen Lakra v Redbridge Panjabi Sabhiacharik Sabha — 2024
- Case reference
- 3201850/2023
- Decision date
- 17 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Harlovleen Lakra
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 26 February 2024 before Employment Judge B Beyzade, the tribunal issued a judgment by consent of the parties. It ordered Redbridge Panjabi Sabhiacharik Sabha to pay Mrs Harlovleen Lakra £192.46 for unauthorised deductions from wages described as holiday pay for the period 1 April 2023 to 20 May 2023, £1,757.28 for breach of contract in respect of notice pay, and £7,531.78 for statutory redundancy pay, with payment due by 4 pm on 22 March 2024. The order also states that the respondent must account to HMRC and to the claimant for any required tax and national insurance on the first two sums.
The judgment also records that the claimant’s separate breach of contract complaint about missing employer pension contributions was not resolved in this order. That complaint was listed to proceed to a final hearing at the London East Employment Tribunal by Cloud Video Platform on 23 May 2024 before an Employment Judge, with a two-hour estimate. Case management orders were issued separately.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment of consent of parties awarding compensation for unauthorised deductions from wages described as holiday pay for the period 1 April 2023 to 20 May 2023. | Settled | — | £192 |
| Breach of contract | Judgment of consent of parties awarding compensation for breach of contract (notice pay). | Settled | — | £1,757 |
| Redundancy | Judgment of consent of parties awarding statutory redundancy pay. | Settled | — | £7,532 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,482
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.