Case 3201852/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Augustine v Barts Health NHS Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 3201852/2023
- Decision date
- 15 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Augustine
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, a long-serving Medical Secretary employed by Barts Health NHS Trust, complained that the Respondent had unlawfully deducted sums from her wages pursuant to a Council Tax Attachment of Earnings Order issued by the London Borough of Waltham Forest under Regulation 37 of the Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992. The Claimant did not dispute the amount deducted but contested the validity of the underlying liability order and the Attachment of Earnings Order, arguing among other things that the Respondent should have sighted the liability order and that a form N337 should have been used.
The Tribunal found that Waltham Forest had followed the statutory process: a summons was issued, the Claimant was notified of the magistrates' court hearing on 22 November 2022, a liability order was made on that date, and an Attachment of Earnings Order was subsequently served on the Respondent on 21 July 2023 in the sum of £1,520.85. The Tribunal held that under Regulation 37(3) the Respondent, as employer, was bound to comply with the order and had no discretion or duty to investigate or validate the process; failure to comply would itself be a criminal offence under Regulation 56(2).
Applying section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Tribunal concluded that the deductions were authorised by a statutory provision and therefore fell within the permitted exceptions to the right not to suffer unauthorised deductions. The Respondent had properly complied with the order, including its entitlement to a £1 administrative fee. The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was not well-founded and the claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claimant challenged the legal basis (not the amount) of deductions made by her employer pursuant to a Council Tax Attachment of Earnings Order served by the London Borough of Waltham Forest. Tribunal held the deductions were authorised by statute. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 37 Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992
- Regulation 56 Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992
- Local Government Finance Act 1992, section 1(1)
- Attachment of Earnings Act 1971
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.