Case 3201857/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Olizarowicz v Essex County Council — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201857/2019
- Decision date
- 3 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Elgot Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mr J Webb, Mr L Rylah
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Olizarowicz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal gave judgment that the complaint of unfair dismissal did not succeed and was dismissed. The written record does not set out the underlying factual reasons, noting that reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
The claims for damages for breach of contract and in respect of unlawful deductions from wages were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. The Claimant confirmed that all contractual sums due and owing to her had been paid.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint of unfair dismissal does not succeed and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim for damages for breach of contract was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant, who confirmed that all contractual sums due and owing had been paid. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim in respect of unlawful deductions from wages was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant, who confirmed that all contractual sums due and owing had been paid. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.