Case 3201857/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Skawinski v Reason and Dignity of Man Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3201857/2020
- Decision date
- 12 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Crosfill Dare
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Skawinski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short strike-out decision. By a letter dated 19 October 2020, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 19 October 2020 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive findings on the underlying merits of the dispute and no monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive claim type; this classification follows the case listing category provided in the case context. The judgment records only that the claim was struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.