Case 3201862/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W McGee v B2c Distribution Limited t/a Wetsuit Outlet — 2021
- Case reference
- 3201862/2020
- Decision date
- 19 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Appearances
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W McGee
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the matter remotely on 19 March 2021 at East London Hearing Centre before Employment Judge Burgher. The judgment records that the claimant, Mr W McGee, appeared in person and the respondent appeared through its managing director, Mr P Williams.
The extracted text contains no findings of fact or legal analysis beyond the disposal. It states that the claimant's claim failed and was dismissed. No remedy, award, or further orders are recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Because the extracted judgment text does not state the legal label of the claim, the classification here follows the GOV.UK listing for the case as unfair dismissal. The judgment itself does not explain the basis on which the claim was rejected.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment text does not identify the pleaded cause of action; the case is classified as unfair dismissal in line with the GOV.UK listing. The judgment records only that the claimant's claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.