Case 3201863/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Finch v Downwell Enabling Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3201863/2023
- Decision date
- 5 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Townley Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Finch
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with a claim for automatically unfair dismissal on health and safety grounds brought by Mr C Finch against Downwell Enabling Ltd. The claimant did not attend the hearing on 8 February 2024, and the respondent was represented by Mr S Fountain.
The written judgment records that the automatically unfair dismissal claim was struck out under Rule 37(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. No substantive merits findings or compensatory award are recorded in the decision, and the judgment states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note on reasons.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claim for automatically unfair dismissal (health and safety reasons) was struck out pursuant to Rule 37(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.