Case 3201868/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Scott v Mr R Whitehouse, Mr P Parker & Ms E Todorova — 2021
- Case reference
- 3201868/2020
- Decision date
- 12 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Ms N Murphy, Dr N Westwood
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Scott
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt London South on 5 May 2021, Employment Judge Tsamados sat with Ms N Murphy and Dr N Westwood. The written judgment records that the claimant was represented in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The decision is a short written record dated 12 May 2021.
The tribunal struck out the claimant's case in 3201868/2020 partly on the basis that it was an abuse of process and partly because it had been brought outside the requisite time limits, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction to deal with it. The written record does not determine the merits of the race discrimination or unfair dismissal complaints. It also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The written judgment does not separate the strike-out basis between individual complaints; it records that the claimant's case was struck out as a whole partly as an abuse of process and partly because it was brought outside the requisite time limits. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment does not separate the strike-out basis between individual complaints; it records that the claimant's case was struck out as a whole partly as an abuse of process and partly because it was brought outside the requisite time limits. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.