Case 3201871/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Fuller v London Borough of Tower Hamlets TELEPHONE PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201871/2019
- Decision date
- 15 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Elgot Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Fuller
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a telephone preliminary hearing on 14 October 2020 before Employment Judge Elgot, the tribunal determined a preliminary disability-status issue in Ms M Fuller's favour. The judgment states that, at the relevant time, she was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010.
The judgment does not record any substantive liability findings on the underlying discrimination complaint, and it contains no monetary award or remedy assessment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal held that, at the relevant time, the Claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.