Case 3201874/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Elmi v The Stambridge Group Limited and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 3201874/2020
- Decision date
- 5 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Brien Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Ms W Blake-Ranken, Mr L Bowman
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr O Elmi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that Mr O Elmi was fairly dismissed, so his unfair dismissal complaint failed and was dismissed. The extracted judgment does not set out any more detailed reasoning beyond that disposal.
The Tribunal also dismissed the claimant's complaints of direct discrimination on the grounds of race and/or religion. The judgment records those discrimination claims together and does not separate the findings between race and religion in the extracted text supplied.
The claimant succeeded on his claim for payment in lieu of accrued and untaken holiday. The Tribunal awarded him £245 gross, and no additional compensation, interest, or injury to feelings award is recorded in the judgment extract.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal found the claimant was fairly dismissed and dismissed the unfair dismissal complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The Tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaint of direct discrimination on grounds of race; the judgment refers to race and religion together and does not separate the reasoning. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The Tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaint of direct discrimination on grounds of religion; the judgment refers to race and religion together and does not separate the reasoning. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Holiday pay | The claimant succeeded on his claim for payment in lieu of accrued and untaken holiday and was awarded £245 gross. | Upheld | — | £245 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £245
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.