Case 3201878/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Karamjeet Kaur Gill v Elegance Beauty Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201878/2020
- Decision date
- 1 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Housego Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Karamjeet Kaur Gill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Karamjeet Kaur Gill brought a claim for unlawful deductions from wages against Elegance Beauty Ltd. The tribunal amended the respondent's name to reflect its legal identity as a limited company and heard the case by telephone on 27 November 2020 before Employment Judge Housego.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been placed on furlough on 30 March 2020 and remained furloughed throughout April and May 2020, when she was paid £794.89 for each month. It accepted that the correct monthly furlough figure was £794.82 and found that furlough ended only on 26 June 2020, following the respondent's email of 24 June 2020.
For June 2020, the respondent had paid £44.47, which it said related to hours worked after furlough ended. The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to furlough pay for the period 1 to 25 June 2020, because furloughed workers were not permitted to work and entitlement to furlough pay did not depend on whether the employer claimed reimbursement from government. It also found that some of the tasks the respondent said the claimant was asked to do were work, and that whether she attended training was not material to the wage claim.
The tribunal calculated the amount due for 25 days of furlough pay by dividing £794.82 by 30 and multiplying by 25, producing £662.41. It ordered the respondent to pay that sum to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimant remained furloughed until 26 June 2020 and was entitled to furlough pay for 1-25 June 2020. The respondent's payment of £44.47 for June was said to relate to hours worked after furlough ended and did not cover the furlough period in issue. | Upheld | — | £662 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £662
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.