Case 3201892/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Hersi v Time 4 U Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3201892/2021
- Decision date
- 7 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Peter Wilkinson
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Hersi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at East London Hearing Centre before Employment Judge Peter Wilkinson on 7 October 2021, heard Ms M Hersi's claims against Time 4 U Limited. It held that her claim for unfair dismissal under section 100 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well founded and dismissed it.
The tribunal also dismissed the claimant's section 44 Employment Rights Act 1996 claim as not well founded. In addition, it dismissed the breach of contract claim relating to non-payment of notice pay. The extracted judgment does not record any monetary award or further remedy findings.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim brought under section 100 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and dismissed as not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claim brought under section 44 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and dismissed as not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract claim in respect of non-payment of notice pay was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.