Case 3201897/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss V Uljarevic v Oliver Walton Limited t/a Cityrooms — 2024
- Case reference
- 3201897/2023
- Decision date
- 21 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Volkmer Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss V Uljarevic
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy case management order dated 11 January 2024, the tribunal gave Miss Uljarevic an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on whether the claim should be struck out. The stated bases were that the proceedings had been conducted unreasonably because she did not attend a hearing she knew was taking place, and that she was not actively pursuing the claim.
In her email of 21 January 2024, the claimant said she would continue not to actively pursue the claim because of an alleged failure by the respondent to comply with a data subject access request. She did not explain why the claim should not be struck out and did not request a hearing. In those circumstances, the tribunal concluded that it was appropriate to strike out the claim because the claimant indicated that she did not intend to actively pursue it.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive legal claim(s); it records only that the claim was struck out after the claimant indicated she would not continue to actively pursue it. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.