Case 3201915/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Brewer v Hardy Engineering Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3201915/2021
- Decision date
- 17 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goodrich Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Brewer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt East London Hearing Centre on 17 December 2021, Employment Judge Goodrich found that Mrs J Brewer’s complaints of unlawful deductions from wages succeeded. The tribunal ordered Hardy Engineering Limited to pay £8,865.83 for that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant in lieu of entitlement to annual leave and ordered payment of £936.91. The claimant’s complaints of failure to make a redundancy payment and failure to pay notice pay were dismissed. No separate interest figure or other remedy components were recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £8,866 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant in lieu of entitlement to annual leave. | Upheld | — | £937 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to 'failure to pay notice pay'; classified here as a breach of contract claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,803
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.