Case 3201916/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Louise Kitson v Chadwell St Mary Day Nursery — 2021
- Case reference
- 3201916/2020
- Decision date
- 25 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barrett Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Louise Kitson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Louise Kitson began work for Chadwell St Mary Day Nursery Ltd on 24 February 2020 on a gross annual salary of £18,250. The tribunal found that her Statement of Main Terms expressly said that it, together with the Employee Handbook, formed part of her contract of employment, and that the Handbook was accessible to her in the staff room. Although she did not read it at the time, the tribunal held that the lay-off clause in the Handbook was incorporated by reference and was apt to be contractual.
The tribunal found that a temporary shortage of work arose in March 2020 because of the Covid-19 pandemic and the national lockdown. It held that this allowed the Respondent to place the Claimant on short-time working or lay-off under the contractual clause, so that pay could be reduced to statutory guarantee pay while laid off and to pay for time actually worked. On that basis, the deductions from wages made after the end of the Claimant's sick pay period were authorised.
The tribunal also found that the April 2020 furlough payment was made in error, because the Respondent mistakenly believed it was entitled to claim under the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme on the Claimant's behalf. It held that the separate deductions clause in the contract entitled the Respondent to recoup previous errors or overpayments, and that the amount said to have been overpaid exceeded the sums paid to the Claimant in May and June 2020. The unauthorised deduction from wages claim and the breach of contract claim were therefore both dismissed, and no award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the Statement of Main Terms expressly incorporated the Employee Handbook, that the lay-off clause was contractual, and that the Respondent was entitled to reduce pay during the Covid-19-related shortage of work to statutory guarantee pay or pay for hours actually worked. It also held that the April 2020 furlough payment was paid in error and could be recouped under the contractual deductions clause. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the deductions in May and June 2020 were authorised by the contractual lay-off and overpayment provisions, so there was no breach of contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- express incorporation by reference
- apt to be incorporated as a contractual term
- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.27B ERA 1996
- Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
- Hussein v Mallenash Ltd
- Alexander v Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd (No.2)
- Hussain v Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.