Case 3201935/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Cole v Rhino’s Plant Hire Ltd (In Administration) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3201935/2023
- Decision date
- 17 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Cole
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant lodged his claim on 19 October 2023, seeking arrears of pay and also stating in the ET1 that he had been wrongfully dismissed. The respondent resisted the claim. The final hearing was listed for 29 January 2024 at East London Hearing Centre by CVP, but neither party appeared in person or was represented.
The Tribunal recorded that notice of the hearing had been sent on 17 November 2023. On 29 January 2024 the Clerk attempted contact with the claimant by telephone and email, and the Tribunal gave him until 12.30 to attend or communicate with the Tribunal about his non-attendance. No response was received. The Tribunal also noted that no additional information or documents had been provided by the claimant and no explanation for his absence was put forward.
At 12.36 the Tribunal dismissed the claim on its own initiative under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The Tribunal said it had considered the material on the file, the nature of the complaints, the overriding objective, and the practicable enquiries made about the claimant's absence. It was satisfied that the claimant had been afforded ample opportunity to attend and that it was not appropriate to hear the claim in his absence. The merits of the arrears of pay and wrongful dismissal issues were not determined.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim lodged as arrears of pay; dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend the final hearing and the Tribunal proceeded in his absence. The merits were not determined. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Raised by the claimant in ET1 section 8.2; dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend the final hearing and the Tribunal proceeded in his absence. The merits were not determined. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Rule 2 overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.