Case 3201942/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Y Arafat Begum v UK Snacks Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201942/2018
- Decision date
- 14 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Y Arafat Begum
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the claim on its merits. It recorded that the respondent company was in administration and that neither the Administrator's consent nor the permission of the court had been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal also noted that on 08 January 2020 it had given the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason.
For those reasons, Employment Judge Gardiner ordered that the claim be struck out on 14 February 2020. No remedy or monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause or causes of action in the extracted text. The claim was struck out because the respondent company was in administration and neither the Administrator's consent nor court permission had been obtained to institute or continue the proceedings, and because the claimant did not provide an acceptable reason after being given an opportunity to do so on 08 January 2020. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.