Case 3201961/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C. Rodrigo v NXG Enterprises Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201961/2019
- Decision date
- 1 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A. Ross Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C. Rodrigo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr C. Rodrigo, attended the final hearing by telephone; the respondent did not attend and had not filed a response. The tribunal decided it was just and equitable to proceed under the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, taking account of rule 46 and the public nature of the hearing. The claimant gave oral evidence, which the tribunal accepted, and his evidence was supported by the respondent's letter dated 7 May 2019 stating that the sum claimed was due and would be paid on 31 May 2019.
The tribunal found that a bonus due in March 2019 was properly payable on 31 May 2019 and had not been paid. It concluded that the sum fell within the definition of wages in section 27 Employment Rights Act 1996, so the complaint of unlawful deduction from wages succeeded. Judgment was entered for unpaid wages of £1,331.59.
The separate redundancy payment claim was dismissed. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had informed it in February 2020 that the redundancy payment had been made and that there were no other sums outstanding. On that basis, and subject to the claimant confirming payment of his full redundancy payment, the tribunal dismissed that claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the bonus due in March 2019 was properly payable on 31 May 2019, had not been paid, and fell within the definition of wages in section 27 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £1,332 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal recorded that, upon the claimant confirming payment of his full redundancy payment, the claim was dismissed; it also noted the claimant had informed the tribunal that the redundancy payment had been made in February 2020 and that no other sums were outstanding. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,332
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,332
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 46 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 27 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.