Case 3201968/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Courtney Mullins Mr Lewis McLuckie v Mannion Group Ltd and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 3201968/2020
- Decision date
- 26 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Representation
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms Courtney Mullins Mr Lewis McLuckie
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was conducted remotely by audio on 25 January 2020 before Employment Judge Jones. The Respondent did not present a response and did not attend or appear. The Tribunal therefore proceeded under Rule 21, with a bundle from the Claimants and sworn evidence from both Claimants.
The Tribunal found that the 1st Respondent had unlawfully deducted the Claimants' wages. It recorded that each Claimant had weekly gross pay of £532.18 and that 80% pay under the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme was £425.74 per week. The Respondent failed to pay either Claimant any furlough pay for the period 23 March 2020 to 17 June 2020.
For Ms Courtney Mullins, the Tribunal calculated 12 weeks at £425.74 per week and awarded £5,108.88. For Mr Lewis McLuckie, it made the same calculation and awarded £5,108.88. The judgment states that each Claimant's employment was terminated on 17 June 2020. No separate award structure beyond the two wage-sum awards was set out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim by Ms Courtney Mullins. The tribunal found the 1st Respondent unlawfully deducted wages by failing to pay furlough pay for 23 March 2020 to 17 June 2020. | Upheld | — | £5,109 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim by Mr Lewis McLuckie. The tribunal found the 1st Respondent unlawfully deducted wages by failing to pay furlough pay for 23 March 2020 to 17 June 2020. | Upheld | — | £5,109 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,218
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.