Case 3201987/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E McHenry v Members Limited t/a Marks Tey Hotel — 2021
- Case reference
- 3201987/2019
- Decision date
- 22 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moor Members
- Panel members
- Ms M Long, Mr M Rowe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E McHenry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously held that the breach of contract claim and the holiday pay claim succeeded. On the contract claim, it found that the contract required one month's notice of termination, that the claimant had been paid £349.20 in lieu of notice, and that his gross monthly pay was £1,513.13, leaving £1,163.93 gross due. The tribunal directed that sum to be paid via payslip with tax and national insurance deductions, but no pension deduction.
The holiday pay claim also succeeded. The tribunal found the agreed leave year ran from 1 April to 9 July, a period of 99 days, and that the claimant had accrued 1.52 weeks of leave by the effective date of dismissal. Using a gross week's pay of £349.20, the tribunal calculated accrued holiday pay at £530.78 and deducted the £139.74 already paid in the final payslip, leaving £391.04 gross due, also to be paid via payslip with tax and national insurance deductions, but no pension deduction.
All remaining complaints were dismissed. The tribunal rejected the four automatic unfair dismissal complaints, namely dismissal for trade union membership, assertion of statutory rights, a health and safety complaint, and making a protected disclosure. It also rejected the direct race discrimination claim, the direct age discrimination claim, and the unlawful deduction of wages claim.
Claims and outcomes
9 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,164 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £391 |
| Trade union | Automatic unfair dismissal complaint for trade union membership. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Automatic unfair dismissal complaint for assertion of statutory rights. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Automatic unfair dismissal complaint for a health and safety complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Automatic unfair dismissal complaint for making a protected disclosure. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination claim. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Age discrimination | Direct age discrimination claim. | Dismissed |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,555
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.