Case 3201989/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A. Bohan v Brooknight Guarding Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201989/2019
- Decision date
- 24 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A. Bohan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under Rule 21. Employment Judge Massarella recorded that Miss A. Bohan had been dismissed in breach of contract and was entitled to a payment in respect of her notice entitlement. The judgment does not specify the amount of that payment.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. No monetary figure was fixed in this judgment.
The tribunal stated that the compensation to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a remedy hearing listed for 13 January 2020 at 12 p.m. No further reasons or legal tests were set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract and entitled to a payment in respect of her notice entitlement, but no amount was set in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment, but no amount was set in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.