Case 3201991/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss I Gaina v Do Transport Management Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201991/2019
- Decision date
- 9 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss I Gaina
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a case management order dated 6 January 2020 and sent to the parties on 9 January 2020, giving the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The reasons given were that the claimant had not attended the final hearing, had not contacted the tribunal in advance to explain the non-attendance or seek another date, and therefore appeared not to be actively pursuing the claim.
The claimant did not make written representations by the deadline of 3 February 2020 and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing fixed for 12 June 2020 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment text does not state the underlying claim type; this classification follows the gov.uk listing for the case as unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant did not attend the final hearing and did not respond to the case management order by the deadline set for representations or a request for a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.