Case 3202002/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Stacey Prout First v Royal Mencap Society Second Respondent: Bethany Howe Third Respondent: Helen Crow — 2019
- Case reference
- 3202002/2018
- Decision date
- 6 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mrs L Conwell-Tillotson, Mr T Brown
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Stacey Prout First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt East London Hearing Centre, Employment Judge Burgher sat with Mrs L Conwell-Tillotson and Mr T Brown on 2, 3, 4 and 5 September 2019. The judgment states in one sentence that the claimant's claims failed and were dismissed.
No separate liability findings, legal reasoning, or monetary award are recorded in the extracted text, so the outcome is recorded as a full dismissal without remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment text states only that the claimant's claims failed and were dismissed; it does not give a separate finding for this claim. The claim type is inferred from the case listing. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment text states only that the claimant's claims failed and were dismissed; it does not give a separate finding for this claim. The claim type is inferred from the case listing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.