Case 3202007/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Robinson Mr P Robinson Mr G Robinson v GW Franklin M & E Services Limited and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202007/2019
- Decision date
- 28 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher JUDGMENT
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr J Robinson Mr P Robinson Mr G Robinson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment, dated 28 April 2020 and heard at the East London Hearing Centre on 27 April 2020 before Employment Judge Burgher, concerned claims brought by Mr J Robinson, Mr P Robinson and Mr G Robinson under case numbers 3202007/2019, 3202008/2019, 3202010/2019 and 3202013/2019. The text supplied records only the outcome in relation to the Second Respondent, RSE Building Services Limited.
Following consideration of correspondence, the tribunal dismissed the Claimants' claims against the Second Respondent. The reason given was that the Claimants were never employed by RSE Building Services Limited. No monetary award, liability finding, or separate remedy assessment is recorded in the supplied text.
The judgment does not set out the underlying claim types, does not refer to any legal test, and does not include findings about the First Respondent. On the material provided, the only recorded finding is that the claims against the Second Respondent failed because no employment relationship existed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the individual causes of action in the text supplied; it states only that the Claimants' claims against the Second Respondent were dismissed because they were never employed by that respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.