Case 3202046/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Jackson v Crumbz Café Limited UPON the Respondent failing to comply with paragraph 1.1 of the Orders made at the hearing on 29 March 2021. — 2021
- Case reference
- 3202046/2020
- Decision date
- 23 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Jackson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Russell Date gave judgment on 23 April 2021 under Rule 21 after the Respondent failed to comply with paragraph 1.1 of the orders made at the hearing on 29 March 2021. The tribunal found that the Respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant’s wages.
The judgment did not determine the amount due. It recorded that the remedy would be decided at a separate Remedy Hearing and that a further notice of hearing would be sent to the parties. The parties were still required to comply with paragraphs 2.1 and 2.2 of the 29 March 2021 orders. The judgment also stated that the Respondent would be permitted to participate in the hearing only to the extent allowed by the Employment Judge hearing the case.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment was issued under Rule 21 after the Respondent failed to comply with paragraph 1.1 of the Orders made on 29 March 2021. The remedy was left to be determined at a separate Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.