Vol. I·6 May 2026

Search the index

Loading…

Loading page content.

Tribunal Watch

A structured, cross-cut index of UK employment tribunal decisions, built from the primary record at gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions. Independent of HMCTS and the Ministry of Justice.

Not legal advice. Information on this site is a matter of public record; it is not guidance on any individual case.

Editorial

About this site
Methodology
Corrections policy
Editorial standards

Rights & privacy

Open Government Licence v3.0
Privacy notice
Data subject requests
Atom feed (recent decisions)

Miss C Jackson v Crumbz Café Limited UPON the Respondent failing to comply with paragraph 1.1 of the Orders made at the hearing on 29 March 2021. — Employment Tribunal 2021 | Tribunal Watch

Tribunal Watch/Crumbz Café Limited UPON the Respondent failing to comply with paragraph 1.1 of the Orders made at the hearing on 29 March 2021./3202046/2020

Case 3202046/2020 · Employment Tribunal

Miss C Jackson v Crumbz Café Limited UPON the Respondent failing to comply with paragraph 1.1 of the Orders made at the hearing on 29 March 2021. — 2021

Case reference: 3202046/2020
Decision date: 23 April 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Russell Date

Indexed: 27 April 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss C Jackson

Respondent

Crumbz Café Limited UPON the Respondent failing to comply with paragraph 1.1 of the Orders made at the hearing on 29 March 2021.

Claims brought

2 categories

Unlawful deduction from wages
Other

Source tags (gov.uk)

Unlawful Deduction from Wages and Written Pay Statement

Outcomes per claim are extracted in a second pass and are not yet published on this page.

Source document

Primary record

The full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Judgment 1 (PDF) ↗

Judgment 2 (PDF) ↗

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.