Case 3202058/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ronnie Downs v PJ Downs and Sons Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3202058/2023
- Decision date
- 28 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mack Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ronnie Downs
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims for unauthorised deductions, identified in the judgment as holiday pay and national minimum wage, because they were brought out of time. Those claims therefore failed without any award being made.
The claimant's claims for notice pay and redundancy pay were found not well-founded and were dismissed. The tribunal also held that, in light of those findings, it had no power to make an award under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, and that claim was dismissed as well.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal dismissed the claimant's unauthorised deduction claims, identified as holiday pay and national minimum wage, because they were brought out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claimant's notice pay claim was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The claimant's redundancy pay claim was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal held that, because of its findings on notice pay and redundancy pay, it had no power to make an award under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, so this claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.