Case 3202069/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Mihail Mardar v Angel Recovery Ltd. — 2024
- Case reference
- 3202069/2023
- Decision date
- 4 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Mihail Mardar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claim on 4 March 2024 at East London Hearing Centre via CVP before Employment Judge B Beyzade. The claimant, Mr Mihail Mardar, appeared in person and the respondent, Angel Recovery Ltd, was represented by its accounts manager, Mr Mohammed Malik.
The only claim determined was for unauthorised deductions from wages, described in the judgment as arrears of pay for the period between 15 August 2023 and 5 September 2023. That claim succeeded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,656.00. The judgment also records that the claimant is responsible for accounting to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due on the sum awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim succeeded for unauthorised deductions from wages (arrears of pay) in relation to the period 15 August 2023 to 5 September 2023. | Upheld | — | £1,656 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,656
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.