Case 3202071/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Dawn Butler v Friends and Places Together and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202071/2020
- Decision date
- 14 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Housego Representation
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Dawn Butler
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Housego dealt with limitation only. The claimant did not attend the hearing, was not represented, and made no submissions. The judgment records an email dismissing her on 19 March 2019, while the claim form gave 21 March 2020 as the dismissal date; the tribunal did not resolve that discrepancy because the claim was out of time on either version of the chronology.
The claimant started early conciliation with Acas on 19 June 2020 in respect of Denise Nygate and on 25 June 2020 in respect of Friends and Places Together, and presented the ET1 on 14 August 2020. The judge held there was no explanation from the claimant showing that it had not been reasonably practicable to present the claim in time, beyond a reference in an email to advice from Acas that was not particularised or supported by any submission to the tribunal.
The claim against Friends and Places Together was therefore struck out for being out of time. The judge added that, even if time could otherwise have been extended, the claim had still been presented 26 days after the EC certificate was obtained, which was a further unreasonable delay. The claim against Denise Nygate was also struck out because she had never been the claimant's employer and, on the balance of probabilities, the claim was out of time in any event.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records an email dismissal date of 19 March 2019, but later chronology refers to March 2020 dates. The tribunal nevertheless found the unfair dismissal claim out of time and struck it out. The claim against Denise Nygate was also said to fail because she was not the claimant's employer. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.111 ERA 1996
- s.207B ERA 1996
- not reasonably practicable test
- reasonable period after expiry
- Dedman principle
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.