Case 3202084/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Schmidt v Terence Andrew Ltd FINAL HEARING — 2025
- Case reference
- 3202084/2024
- Decision date
- 11 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore Appearances
- Venue
- East London Tribunal Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Schmidt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe final hearing took place at the East London Tribunal Hearing Centre on 11 August 2025 before Employment Judge S Shore. The claimant, Mrs H Schmidt, appeared in person and the respondent did not appear.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s breach of contract claim was well-founded and succeeded. It ordered Terence Andrew Ltd to pay £2,352.00, without deduction of tax or National Insurance, by 1 September 2025.
The tribunal also held that the claimant’s claim for a statutory redundancy payment was well-founded and succeeded. It ordered the respondent to pay £4,900.00, also without deduction of tax or National Insurance, by 1 September 2025. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,352 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,900 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,252
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.