Case 3202085/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Adeyemi v Bcs Connect — 2023
- Case reference
- 3202085/2020
- Decision date
- 8 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Adeyemi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claim brought by Mr A Adeyemi against Bcs Connect was not being actively pursued. By a letter dated 31 January 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing explaining why the claim should not be struck out on that basis.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not contain any findings on the underlying merits of the wage deduction complaint.
No monetary award was made. The decision is a procedural strike out only, dated 8 March 2023, and was signed by Acting Regional Employment Judge Burgher Date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not determine the merits of the claim. It was struck out after the claimant did not make sufficient written representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's 31 January 2023 letter about non-pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.