Case 3202088/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Hills v Barts Health NHS Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 3202088/2020
- Decision date
- 28 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Feeny Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Hills
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records a hearing before Employment Judge Feeny at East London Hearing Centre by CVP on 28 July 2022. The Claimant was represented by Mr P Morson, a non-legal representative, and the Respondent by Mr J Powell, solicitor.
The tribunal refused the Claimant's application to strike out the Response pursuant to rule 37. It also refused the Claimant's application for a costs order against the Respondent pursuant to rule 76. The judgment does not determine the substantive unfair dismissal, race discrimination, or breach of contract claims listed in the case categories.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment refused the Claimant's application to strike out the Response pursuant to rule 37; it did not determine the substantive listed claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment refused the Claimant's application for a costs order against the Respondent pursuant to rule 76. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 76
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.