Case 3202089/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Barclays Execution Services Ltd and others — 2022
- Case reference
- 3202089/2020
- Decision date
- 16 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Crosfill Appearances
- Venue
- East London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant met the statutory test for disability in section 6 Equality Act 2010 from 1 March 2016, by reason of a physical impairment to his knee joints, but not before that date. Any claims relying on disability before 1 March 2016 were struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success.
By consent, the claimant's indirect discrimination claims brought under sections 19 and 39 Equality Act 2010, based on race and disability, were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.
Claims in case No 3200325/2021 against Konstantina Armata, Claire Fordham and Sonya Boniface were struck out because no allegations were pleaded against them. The final order also dismissed case No 3202089/2020 upon withdrawal by the claimant; the ACAS Early Conciliation sentence immediately before that dismissal refers to case No 320090/2020 in the extracted text. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held the claimant met the section 6 Equality Act 2010 disability test from 1 March 2016 by reason of a physical impairment to his knee joints, and struck out any claims insofar as they relied on disability before that date as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The claimant's indirect discrimination claims under sections 19 and 39 Equality Act 2010 based on race were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claimant's indirect discrimination claims under sections 19 and 39 Equality Act 2010 based on disability were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Other | Claims in case No 3200325/2021 against Konstantina Armata, Claire Fordham and Sonya Boniface were struck out because no allegations were pleaded against them and the tribunal found no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Case No 3202089/2020 was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant; the preceding ACAS Early Conciliation sentence refers to case No 320090/2020 in the extracted text. | Withdrawn |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Sections 19 and 39 Equality Act 2010
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.