Case 3202090/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs F Rizvi v Gary Ashworth and 3 others — 2021
- Case reference
- 3202090/2018
- Decision date
- 6 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brown JUDGMENT
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Mrs F Rizvi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 25 May 2021, the Tribunal gave Mrs F Rizvi an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The judgment records that the claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37. The judgment is procedural only and does not contain findings on the merits of the underlying employment claims. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that the claim was struck out for non-pursuit; the underlying claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states only that the claim was struck out for non-pursuit; the underlying claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.