Case 3202091/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Jackson v Hypervolt Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3202091/2023
- Decision date
- 6 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Jackson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge determined that the claim could properly be decided in the respondent's absence.
The tribunal found that Hypervolt Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Mr S Jackson's wages and ordered the respondent to pay him £2,000 gross. The judgment does not break that sum down into separate remedy components.
The tribunal also found that Mr Jackson was unfairly dismissed. The remedy for the unfair dismissal was not determined in this judgment and was listed to be decided at a later Remedy Hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £2,000 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,000 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, but the remedy was deferred to a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.