Case 3202101/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Terry Bishop v Thameside Electrical Limited (in liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 3202101/2023
- Decision date
- 11 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Povey Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Terry Bishop
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Terry Bishop brought a claim against his former employer, Thameside Electrical Limited (in liquidation), seeking a redundancy payment and notice pay. The final hearing was listed for 11 March 2024 and proceeded by CVP at East London Hearing Centre before Employment Judge S Povey. Neither party attended the hearing, and the Tribunal waited until 12.30pm after the clerk tried to contact the claimant by telephone twice without success.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Claim for a redundancy payment dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend the final hearing and did not provide evidence in support of the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend the final hearing and did not provide evidence in support of the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.