Case 3202116/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Dance Mr M Howard v Premier Moving Services — 2022
- Case reference
- 3202116/2019
- Decision date
- 24 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Dance Mr M Howard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment in case numbers 3202116/2019 and 3202117/2019, brought by Mr I Dance and Mr M Howard against Premier Moving Services. The tribunal recorded that by a letter dated 31 October 2020 it had given the claimants an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out for non-compliance with the tribunal's order dated 10 January 2020 and because the claims had not been actively pursued.
The claimants did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claims. No substantive liability findings or remedy assessment were made in the judgment.
The judgment is signed by Acting Regional Employment Judge Burgher and dated 24 November 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment covers case numbers 3202116/2019 and 3202117/2019. The tribunal struck out the claims because the claimants did not comply with the order dated 10 January 2020 and had not actively pursued the claims. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.