Case 3202119/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Simpson v H&O Classic Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3202119/2019
- Decision date
- 18 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Simpson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 18 December 2019 at East London Hearing Centre, Employment Judge Gardiner ordered H&O Classic Limited to pay Mrs J Simpson a redundancy payment of £2,884.62 under section 135 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal calculated that sum using gross weekly pay of £480.77, four years' continuous service and an age adjustment factor of 1.5. It held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the remainder of the Claimant's claims because the proceedings were issued outside the statutory time period, and those claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to the remainder of the Claimant's claims and dismisses them for being issued outside the statutory time period; this claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Awarded under section 135 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Calculated using gross weekly pay of £480.77, four years' continuous service and an age adjustment factor of 1.5. | Upheld | — | £2,885 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to the remainder of the Claimant's claims and dismisses them for being issued outside the statutory time period; this claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,885
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 135 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.