Case 3202119/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Harper v London Borough of Newham — 2024
- Case reference
- 3202119/2023
- Decision date
- 19 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Overton Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Harper
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing, the Tribunal refused the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's claims on time-limit grounds, except that the respondent acknowledged the allegation of 11 July 2023 was within time. The Tribunal stated that whether the claims were presented within the applicable time limit would be decided at the final hearing.
The Tribunal also refused the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's claims under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a) on the basis that they had no reasonable prospect of success. It further refused the respondent's application for a deposit order in respect of the allegation of 11 July 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is a preliminary hearing decision on strike-out and deposit-order applications. It does not determine the substantive claims or identify them beyond referring to the claimant's claims and an allegation of 11 July 2023. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a)
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.