Case 3202134/2016 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Ojo v CT Plus (Yorkshire) Community Interest Company — 2019
- Case reference
- 3202134/2016
- Decision date
- 2 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Tobin Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Ojo
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr O Ojo, resigned on 31 August 2016 and alleged constructive unfair dismissal under section 95(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. By the time of the final hearing, the disability discrimination and holiday pay claims had been withdrawn, and the direct race discrimination and unlawful deduction claims had been struck out, leaving the constructive dismissal complaint for determination.
The tribunal considered six grievances raised between February 2015 and February 2016. It found that the first two grievances did not leave any substantial ongoing issue by 24 March 2015, that the third grievance against another driver was withdrawn on 8 May 2015, that the fourth grievance about HW was resolved by the investigation report and measures put in place in April 2016, and that the fifth and sixth grievances about the handling of a sexual harassment complaint had no substance. It accepted that the respondent’s grievance handling was inadequate because the grievances were not formally closed, but it held that the failures were procedural rather than substantive.
Applying the authorities on constructive dismissal and the implied term of mutual trust and confidence, including Western Excavating, Woods, and Omilaju, the tribunal found that no individual grievance and no cumulative combination of them amounted to a fundamental or repudiatory breach of contract. It also found that the claimant delayed too long before resigning, so any earlier breach had in any event been affirmed. The tribunal held that the resignation was prompted by the separate pay dispute rather than by any breach established on the evidence, and it dismissed the unfair dismissal claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal claim under s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996. The tribunal noted that the disability discrimination and holiday pay claims had already been withdrawn, and the direct race discrimination and unlawful deduction claims had already been struck out before the final hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- implied term of mutual trust and confidence
- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
- Courtaulds Northern Textile Ltd v Andrew
- Woods v WM Car Services (Peterborough) Ltd
- Waltham Forest London Borough v Omilaju
- Morrow v Safeway Stores
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.