Case 3202147/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Shore v British Global Integrated Systems — 2025
- Case reference
- 3202147/2023
- Decision date
- 3 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Lewis Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Shore
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with the claimant’s unfair dismissal complaint at this stage. It held that the complaint under section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 had not been presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable for it to have been presented in time.
The judgment records the complaint as struck out, and the reasons state that the unfair dismissal claim was therefore dismissed. No remedy was awarded because the claim did not proceed to a substantive hearing.
The tribunal further recorded that the claimant’s Equality Act 2010 claims remained live and would be listed for hearing on a date to be notified.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal complaint brought under section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was struck out. The reasons say it was not presented within the applicable time limit, that it was reasonably practicable to do so, and that the claim was therefore dismissed. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 111 Employment Rights Act 1996
- applicable time limit
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.